Search
Topics
  Home  ·  Topics  ·  Top 10  
Modules
· Home
· AvantGo
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics

Random Headlines

Stop The Gag of Political Correctness
[ Stop The Gag of Political Correctness ]

·Korean Crime Cover-up? The Gag of Political Correctness?
·The Academy Awards aka The Deviant Awards
·They think you are dumb, prove them wrong & vote against them
·Should Norfolk Change How its school board gets picked?
·Who is Sexier??
·Boycott A&E for violating free speech
·Is politics as ''un-Christian-like''?
·Equality ~ Will there ever be?
·In the Zimm/ Martin matter a great deal was not exposed.

CNN LAW
·Court upholds limits on Navy sonar training
·Slain wife accuses husband from the grave
·Prosecutors drop parent-killing case
·Priest accused of lying in mob investigation
·Inmate shot dead after brazen escape
·Juror: Judge and jury pressured me to convict
·Man convicted for Internet hoax death
·Zoloft killer's 30-year sentence appealed
·Girl who shielded mom is a hero at school
·Holloway disappearance hits cold case file

read more...

Disclosures Competition Realty

Conventions
User Agreement
Disclaimer
Disclosure
Operational Philosophy
Privacy Policy
 Welcome To One of The Best Sites on The Web

Competition Realty''s Principal Broker has an interest in this site. buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.

Voter News and Issues HELPcom.Net

Welcome to HELPcom.NET Your Source of Voter News and Issues

Mission Statement

About HELPcom.NET

HELPcom.NET, LLC [Help Communications Network] focuses on promoting good government practices: designating officials who sacrifice the common good to special interests. We will help Americans to shine a light on those who betray the public trust:

If a public official misuses his position to demand campaign contributions, HELPcom.NET will find creative ways to seek civil remedies.
If a witness is threatened or punished because he/she reported official misconduct, HELPcom.NET will fight back on behalf of the witness.
If a government agency withholds information to which the public is entitled, HELPcom.NET will help enforce legal rules regarding disclosure.
If a group libels an honest public servant, HELPcom.NET will help the victim defend his reputation.

HELPcom.NET will seize opportunities like these, bringing high-impact public exposures of evil doers. The majority of our reports and stories will focus on real people and their stories about the lack of government integrity. Not only do these people need and deserve our support, their stories can serve as powerful tools to seize public attention and move public opinion. HELPcom.NET will work with the press, government investigators, and other public interest groups to make sure that these peoples' stories are heard. In the process, HELPcom.NET will build a non-partisan investigative alliance that transcends specific issues. Our aim is to encourage officials to be open about their values and to act based upon their honest and best assessment of the public interest.

As we do this, over time HELPcom.NET will develop a network of public interest groups, sympathetic government investigators and media contacts ... a far-reaching, more mainstream version of the conservative league of individuals that has been so effective. We will work with that network to focus public attention on government integrity and to educate the public about dishonest or disingenuous government officials. If history is any indication, this type of network can have a substantial impact on public opinion.

To report official misconduct of , a public official who is violating his public trust by misuse of his position to demand campaign contributions, threatened or punished a witness because he/she reported official misconduct, a government agency withholds information to which the public is entitled:

    1. mail the details to Public Malfeasance - HELPcom.NET, P.O. Box 65002, Virginia Beach, Va 23467-5002;
    2. email the details to newsservice@helpcom.net;
About your Editor and History:

Your editor has been a historian for over 55 years and a forensic accountant for over 36 years.

Most of what we know of history is very limited and from the vantage point of the social male economically elite and the clergy of the period. This is because they were the part of society they taught to read and write. This provides us with little evidence of how the majority of society saw the world.

What we see in today's reflection of history and in the history of the past is not  a recording of events that is not colored by the blind of the politically motivated.  What we see is the politically motivated historian. As E. H. Carr. In What Is History? (1961) points out that the historian is likely to only write about subjects he/she cares about. In the words of another historian, W. H. B. Court: "History free of all values cannot be written. Indeed, it is a concept almost impossible to understand, for men will scarcely take the trouble to inquire laboriously into something which they set no value upon."

Carr also says of of historians that the historian starts off with a theory that needs to be tested by the evidence. The theory will reflect the political views of the historian. Carr makes the important point about the nature of the facts that the historian uses: "The facts are really not at all like fish on the fishmonger's slab. They are like fish swimming about in a vast and sometimes inaccessible ocean; and what the historian catches will depend, partly on chance, but mainly on what part of the ocean he chooses to fish in and what tackle he chooses to use – these two factors being, of course, determined by the kind of fish he wants to catch. By and large, the historian will get the kind of facts he wants. History means interpretation."

When you read a news article or see the nightly news reports you should do so by asking yourself some serious questions. When the commentator/historian do his research on his piece  was he being totally objective? Was he testing a theory that was highly subjective? Was he only looking for "facts" to support his theory and rejecting evidence that suggested other interpretations? As a historian you attempt to act in a completely objective way, but is it really achievable?

HCN
takes news stories as they are, post them unchanged and asks questions that that HCN feels you should ask ands all the while point out where the reporter has rejected evidence that suggests other interpretations or not being totally objective.

Please feel free to pass along and insight you may have on any of our posts:

To Comment read over and agree to abide by  
HCN's Posting Guidelines which are found at:

By a Mouse Over of the Guidelines IMAGE and clicking the IMAGE




Become a HNC Commentator

HCN Commentators come from all walks of life brining original content that entertains, informs, and inspires HNC’s readers. They are credible, passionate and influential because of their knowledge of a specific topics. Join their ranks. 

 

To Request to become a HNC Commentator

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.


Speak out at the ballot box

If Congress felt that its members were going to be former members, all ~ via the ballot box ~ they would act to impeach the BAM. Since there is no threat of that happening, BAM  Sharia law, Marxism and Socialist agendas go on. It is just that simple, speak out at the ballot box.

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.

Competition Realty Business Brokers

Business Brokers Virginia Norfolk Virginia Beach Chesapeake

Competition Realty

Business Brokers

Virginia Beach * Norfolk * Chesapeake 

Business Brokerage Services

We make buying and selling businesses as efficient and easy as possible.

Sell your business confidentially and professional through David Lindsey, Principal Broker with Competition Realty

David M. Lindsey, Principal Broker

Competition Realty

Business Brokers

broker@realtycom.net

www.realtycom.net

Competition Realty, LLC | 5368 Providence Road | Virginia Beach,  Virginia 23464 | 757.424.5102

 

 

 

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.

HelpCom's Impact

Editor's note: HCN’s columns may include satire and parody based on current events, and thus mix fact with fiction. HCN assumes informed readers will be able to tell which is which.

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.

Cash For Real Estate

Cash for Real Estate

Cash for Real Estate



We have Clients Who
Have Cash and Want to Buy
Your Real Estate
Call Us Now To See If
Your Property Qualifies

757 - 424 - 5102
Competition Realty


CNN TOP STORIES

·J.K. Rowling's new 'Harry Potter' tale
·Comedian, rap mogul arrested
·Suspected trooper killer caught
·Tyson: CNN anchor 'full of s**t'
·LeBron ad you'll be talking about
·Girl, 8, scolds Senate candidates
·Cups a clue in family's mystery deaths
·4 dead: Plane hits FlightSafety building
·WWII wreckage raised from lake
·Suze Orman on CEO coming out

read more...

Philly Inquirer

·Feds: Mom took explicit photos of children, offered them for sex
·Investigator: Frein 'fully' expected capture
·'Inappropriate' photo texts investigated at Bucks school
·Kane injured in car accident, AG's office says
·Archdiocese holds first day for teachers and administrators
·First frost
·Man dies after shooting at 11th & Poplar streets
·After murder suspect is caught, a sigh of relief
·Cops: Man nearly sliced neighbor's ear in half
·What region is doing to guard against virus

read more...

Virginian-Pilot Headline News

·Spacecraft for tourists explodes on test flight
·Judge rejects attempt to isolate nurse
·Ashes from Ebola victim's apartment in limbo
·Early votes exceed 15 million _ but who benefits?
·Mexico police questioned in killing of 3 Americans
·Analysis: In Syria, no good options for West
·AP EXCLUSIVE: Military sex survey draws complaints
·2 arrested as people flock to Hawaii lava
·After murder suspect is caught, a sigh of relief
·Gas falling under $3 nationwide: What to know

read more...

LA Times

·For the record
·'Olive Kitteridge'
·For the record
·'Olive Kitteridge'
·Skin care advice for fall-winter in Southern California
·Letters: Tough for Dodgers fans to watch World Series, again
·'Tough day' for space travel as Virgin Galactic's spaceship crashes
·Woman being monitored for Ebola-like symptoms in Oregon
·Kaci Hickox and Ebola's scarlet 'E' stigma
·Breeders' Cup Day 1: Lady Eli wins Juvenile Fillies Turf

read more...

Obama anti-Jew Campaign Goes To The Supreme Court
Re Branding Sharia / Islam Evil Obama anti-jew campaign goes to the Supreme Court

+

More on Sunni Moslem Obama's anti-Jew Campaign

Obama anti-Jew Campaign Goes To The Supreme Court

Why is the U. S. media silent on Sunni Moslem Obama's anti-Jew postures

Obama takes his anti-Jew Campaign to the U.S. Supreme Court

 

justiciability, RECOGNITION (INTERNATIONAL LAW), FOREIGN RELATIONS AUTHORIZATION ACT, DISPUTED TERRITORIES
November 3, 2014
United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Does a federal statute that directs the Secretary of State, upon an American citizen’s request, to record the birthplace of an American citizen born in Jerusalem as born in “Jerusalem, Israel” on a United States passport and on a Consular Report of Birth Abroad infringe upon the President’s authority to recognize foreign states and governments?

Zivotofsky v. Kerry

Issues 

Does a federal statute that directs the Secretary of State, upon an American citizen’s request, to record the birthplace of an American citizen born in Jerusalem as born in “Jerusalem, Israel” on a United States passport and on a Consular Report of Birth Abroad infringe upon the President’s authority to recognize foreign states and governments?

Oral argument: 
November 3, 2014

When the United States does not have an official position regarding which country controls a city, United States passports will list the city of birth but not a country of birth. The Supreme Court will now determine two legal issues: (1) whether Foreign Relations Authorization Act’s Section 214(d) is an exercise of regulating the issuance of passports or an exercise of recognizing foreign nations; and (2) if Section 214(d) is an act of recognition, whether the President has exclusive authority to recognize foreign nations. Zivotofsky argues that Section 214(d) is a constitutional exercise of Congress’ power to regulate the issuance of passports and also contends that the Constitution does not vest exclusive recognition authority in the President. The Secretary of State argues that Section 214(d) is a constitutional exercise of the President’s power to recognize foreign nations and also contends that the Constitution vests exclusive recognition authority in the President. The Supreme Court’s decision could affect U.S. foreign policy and the allocation of powers between the legislative and executive branches.

Questions as Framed for the Court by the Parties 

Whether a federal statute that directs the Secretary of State, on request, to record the birthplace of an American citizen born in Jerusalem as born in “Israel” on a Consular Report of Birth Abroad and on a United States passport is unconstitutional on the ground that the statute “impermissibly infringes on the President’s exercise of the recognition power reposing exclusively in him.”

Facts 

Due to the Arab-Israeli conflict, the "political status of Jerusalem has been in dispute since 1948." As part of peacekeeping efforts, the United States government does not recognize Jerusalem as belonging to any sovereign nation. In keeping with this general policy, the State Department requires that citizens born in Jerusalem after May 14, 1948, have their place of birth recorded as “Jerusalem” without reference to Israel or any other country. On September 30, 2002, Congress enacted Section 214(d) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act (“FRAA”), which provided that United States citizens born in Jerusalem can request the Secretary of State to record their place of birth as Israel.President Bush signed the FRAA into law but issued an accompanying statement which stated that Section 214(d) impermissibly interferes with the President’s exclusive authority to conduct foreign affairs, supervise the executive branch, and recognize foreign governments. The President’s statement further declared that the provision did not alter the United States’ policy regarding Jerusalem.

Menachem Zivotofksy was born in Jerusalem in 2002. Because both of Zivotofsky’s parents are United States citizens, Zivotsofky is also an American citizen and therefore entitled to a United States passport. On December 24, 2002, Zivotofsky’s mother, Naomi Siegman Zivotofsky, applied for a United States passport and a Consular Report of Birth Abroad from the United States Embassy in Tel Aviv, Israel on her son’s behalf. On the application, Zivotofsky’s mother requested that both documents list Zivostfsky’s birthplace as “Jerusalem, Israel.” When the State Department refused the request and instead listed “Jerusalem” without reference to Israel, Zivotofsky, through his parents, sued the Secretary of State to compel the State Department to record Zivotofsky’s place of birth as “Israel.”

The District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed Zivotofsky’s case for lack of subject matter jurisdictionbecause Zivotofsky lacked standing and the complaint centered around a non-justiciable political question. The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reversed the district court’s decision and held that Zivotofsky did have standing but remanded the case to create a clearer record on the matter of whether the case presented a non-justiciable political question. On remand, the district court again dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and held that the case presented a non-justiciable political question. The court of appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court of the United States (“Court”) held that the case did not involve a political question but rather involved a justiciable constitutional issue surrounding recognition powers. The Court then reversed and remanded to resolve the raised constitutional question. On remand, the court of appeals held that Section 214(d) impermissibly infringed on the President’s exclusive power to recognize foreign governments. The Court then granted writ of certiorari to address whether or not the provision impermissibly infringed on the President’s recognition powers.

Discussion 

The Court will determine whether Section 214(d) of the FRAA unconstitutionally infringes on the President’s exclusive recognition power. Zivotofsky argues that Section 214(d) does not infringe on the President’s authority to recognize foreign governments because Section 214(d) is an exercise of Congress’ power to regulate the issuance of passports and the President does not have exclusive authority to recognize foreign governments.  Conversely, Secretary of State John Kerry (“Secretary”) argues that Section 214(d) encroaches on the President’s recognition powers because Section 214(d) is an exercise of recognition and the Constitution gives the President exclusive power to recognize foreign states. The outcome of this case will likely impact foreign policy and also likely impact the balance of powers between the executive and legislative branches of government.

IMPACT ON FOREIGN POLICY 

Zivotofsky and supporting amici claim that enforcing Section 214(d) will have a negligible impact on foreign policy.Supporting amici argue that Section 214(d) is a narrow law that represents neither a pronouncement by the United States on the status of Jerusalem nor a shift in the United States’ position to not recognize any country’s sovereignty over Jerusalem. Instead, the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists explains that Section 214(d), rather than expressing the United States’ position on Jerusalem, expresses an American passport holder’s position that Jerusalem is part of Israel. Other supporting amici refer to an analogous American law that allows American citizens, who were born in Taiwan, to list their birth place as “Taiwan,” even though the United States does not recognize Taiwan as a state separate from the People’s Republic of China. These amici cite this law as proof that the Secretary could enforce Section 214(d) without negatively impacting an international foreign policy.

The Secretary claims that enforcing Section 214(d) will have a significant impact on foreign policy. The Secretary asserts that the President should have exclusive power to recognize the sovereignty of other nations because the United States must speak with one voice with regards to foreign policy. The Secretary explains that allowing both Congress and the President to weigh in on this foreign policy issue will create international uncertainty about the United States’ official position on Jerusalem. The Secretary also maintains that Section 214(d) undermines the President’s commitment to continuing Arab-Israeli negotiations on Jerusalem’s status, which could undermine the United States’ ability to participate in peacekeeping efforts in the region. Further, the Secretary maintains that changing the United States’ policy on Jerusalem can negatively impact trade relations and the treatment of Americans abroad. In support of the Secretary’s position of advancing peace negotiations, True Torah Jews adds that Jerusalem should continue to be considered an international city and a free zone.  

IMPACT ON BALANCE OF POWERS

Zivotofsky and supporting amici argue that failure to enforce Section 214(d) will undermine Congressional authority and upset the balance of powers between the executive and legislative branches. The Senate and the Anti-Defamation League argue that Congress was within its sphere of authority to enact Section 214(d) because Congress has the power to regulate the issuance of passports. Supporting amici further add that the balance of powers will not be upset by the enforcement of Section 214(d) because Section 214(d) is a ministerial task of little significance. ; Further, supporting amici contend that if the Court finds that the President has exclusive recognition powers and control of foreign policy, the executive branch would have too much power over foreign policy.

Conversely, the Secretary maintains that enforcing Section 214(d) will upset the balance of powers by infringing on the President’s exclusive authority to recognize foreign nations. The Secretary argues that the President has the exclusive right to receive Ambassadors and recognize foreign nations under Article II, § 3 of the United States Constitution (“Constitution”). The Secretary further argues that, since the Constitution’s clauses related to foreign relations do not mention Congress and instead only mention the President’s authority, Congress is barred from legislating in the realm of foreign relations. The Secretary adds that sharing recognition powers between Congress and the President would undermine the United States’ ability to make recognition decisions with necessary efficiency.

Analysis 

The Court will decide whether Section 214(d) of the FRAA impermissibly infringes the President’s authority to recognizeforeign nations. In doing so, the Supreme Court must determine two legal issues: (1) whether Section 214(d) is an exercise of regulating the issuance of passports or an exercise of recognizing foreign nations; and (2) if Section 214(d) is an act of recognition, whether the President has exclusive authority to recognize foreign nations. Zivotofsky argues that Section 214(d) is a constitutional exercise of Congress’ power to regulate the issuance of passports. Zivotofsky also contends that the Constitution does not vest exclusive recognition authority in the President. The Secretary argues that Section 214(d) is a constitutional exercise of the President’s power to recognize foreign nations. The Secretary also contends that the Constitution vests exclusive recognition authority in the President.

IS SECTION 214(d) PASSPORT LEGISLATION OR AN EXECUTIVE ACT OF RECOGNITION?

Zivotofsky maintains that Section 214(d) is a constitutional exercise of Congress’ Article I power to regulate the issuance of passports. Zivotofsky asserts that Congress frequently regulates the issuance and content of passports “even when they affect significant policy concerns.” Zivotofsky thus argues that the President’s foreign policy objectives can exist side-by-side with Section 214(d). Zivotofsky analogizes Section 214(d) to the State Department Authorization Technical Corrections Act of 1994 (“Corrections Act”), which provided that the Secretary of State could “‘permit’ U.S. citizens born in Taiwan to list ‘Taiwan’ as the place of birth on their U.S. passports” instead of “China.”Zivotofsky explains that the State Department believed that the Corrections Act was inconsistent with the United States’ “one-China” policy, which recognized the People’s Republic of China as China’s sole legal government.Nevertheless, Zivotofsky noted that the State Department was still able to enforce the Corrections Act while maintaining its one-China policy. Zivotofsky also argues that the Secretary can enforce Section 214(d) and issue a formal policy declaration that explicitly states that American foreign policy regarding Jerusalem has not changed.

The Secretary argues that Section 214(d) is a constitutional exercise of the President’s Article II power to recognize foreign nations.The Secretary explains that recognition “is an official conclusion by the United States that the entity in question meets the requirements of a state or government[] and should be treated as such” by the United States.Since the Secretary and the President do not consider Jerusalem within the sovereign control of any nation, the Secretary states that the President must ensure that communications with foreign sovereigns consistently express this view. The Secretary argues that passports are a means of diplomatic communication through which the President expresses this message to foreign nations. 

Posted by editor on Tuesday, October 28 @ 07:31:10 MST (23 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



Goochland County's use of federal civil asset forfeiture laws
Civil Rights federal civil asset forfeiture laws ~ bad conduct by Goochland County

Avoid Goochland and Lousia Counties

In Virginia

federal civil asset forfeiture laws

Are Lousia and Goochland Counties in Virginia Using these Programs to 

Boost their Coffers and not work to trim the fat off their payrolls? 

 We asked this question because of questionable conduct of their sheriff deputies 

And what appears their failure to have any evidence to support their acts

We can say this as the Attorney for the Commonwealth and the Sheriff for Goochland County have failed to produce any evidence that supports a recent action action by it sheriff deputies, in spite of their being required to have and produce such records under Virginia's Public Records Act and Freedom of information act. 

WE are not allowed to share any information at this time as there is an active case civil and possible criminal case being pursued via the Unalienable Rights Foundation, says Mike Bogacki of UARF.  But he says he will forward the preservation notice UARF sent to Goochland authorities with gives them knowledge and notice of pending actions as those are are public records.  We will make them available as soon as they are received.  

 

 

The Examiner says with HCN comments in [ ]s 

Lawmaker to AG Holder: Why so many cash and property seizures by cops?

A Republican lawmaker on Friday officially requested that outgoing Attorney General Eric H. Holder provide an number of documents and other data regarding the U.S. Justice Department’s role in tens of thousands seizures -- or assets forfeitures -- of cash and property that were taken with the blessing of President Barack Obama in recent years by state and local police under federal civil asset forfeiture laws.

Property seizures, a/k/a assets forfeiture, is a multi-billion dollar government enterprise that's grown under the Obama administration.
Courtesy of Americans for Constitutional Law

An official letter from Rep. F. James “Jim” Sensenbrenner, R-Wisconsin, the chairman of the House Judiciary subcommittee on crime, terrorism, homeland security and investigations, to the Attorney General is part of an inquiry into the alleged billions of dollars in seizures made through the Justice Department’s Equitable Sharing Program, which is the Justice Department's largest asset forfeiture initiative under President Obama. [being used to support Obama's social engineering programs  / the and follow the current African model of social justice.  What is called third world justice and Islamite justice programs are anti-white and anti-Christian]

“While we must ensure law enforcement is properly equipped, they should not be funded by slush funds accrued by violating Americans’ civil liberties,” Sensenbrenner said in his statement Friday. What is also disturbing to the GOP is that originally forfeitures were used when dealing with narcotics money and lab equipment, vehicles used to transport drugs and contraband, and other assets linked to crimes. Today it's being used during the "fishing expedition" investigations of legitimate businesses

Sensenbrenner specifically requested that Holder provide details about the current policies regarding the seizures as well as the standard of proof needed from law enforcement before the federal government “adopts” a state or local seizure into the Equitable Sharing Program. During the President Barack Obama years, what amounts to a "pick but don't pay" program has increased significantly. According to federal law, cash and property seizures are lawful when police say they believe the property in question is tied to a crime through a preponderance of the evidence. [Preponderance of evidence is a fact finder job via the court room not a affirmative action  hire program as it has become.  Judges are allowing it even though it is not legal because it means the slushy  pay checks the judges keeping coming with out the judges having to work for them doing their jobs, like deciding if there is  a preponderance of the evidence  that would allow a seizure].

According to a watchdog group's report, it appears that there are too many agencies and officials who've come to depend on assets forfeiture which has caused what can only be termed acceptable corruption. The nonprofit, public-interest group, Forfeiture Endangers American Rights Foundation (FEAR) reports that:

"Incredible as it sounds, civil asset forfeiture laws allow the government to seize property without charging anyone with a crime. Until FEAR achieved the nation's first major federal forfeiture law reform at the turn of the millennium, the government was allowed to keep whatever property it seized without ever having to prove a case. Seized property was presumed guilty and could be forfeited based upon mere hearsay—even a tip supplied by an informant who stood to gain up to 25% of the forfeited assets. Owners were forced into the untenable situation of trying to prove a negative—that something never happened, even though no proof of any illegal act had been offered at trial. Newspapers and television stories across the nation documented hundreds of cases of innocent citizens wrongfully deprived of their homes, businesses and livelihoods. Eighty percent of property forfeited to the US during the previous decade was seized from owners who were never even charged with a crime!"

"One of the complaints heard by police officers and law enforcement officials is that when someone is arrested, they are innocent until proven guilty. However, even before the trial the government confiscates cash and property that they claim are ill-gotten gains and therefore subject to seizure," said former police homicide and narcotics detective Benjamin Cardona.

In a Washington Post feature story in September, the newspaper spoke with a Florida police chief about the program: “Those laws were meant to take a guy out for selling $1 million in cocaine or who was trying to launder large amounts of money,” said Mark Overton, the police chief in Bal Harbour, Fla., who once oversaw a federal drug task force in South Florida. “It was never meant for a street cop to take a few thousand dollars from a driver by the side of the road.”

"That's why the federal government uses civil law rather than criminal law to make the seizures legal: criminal offenses require proof beyond reasonable doubt for conviction, but civil law only requires a preponderance of evidence, which is a lower standard," said the veteran detective.

Sensenbrenner said that he too questions the veracity of the program since he believes local authorities turn to the Justice Department’s program when their state's civil asset forfeiture laws are stricter than the federal statute. The Republican said that he's concerned over reports and complaints police and sheriff's departments have sometimes violated individual rights when the seize cash and property and then fail to file criminal charges­.

“The implications on civil liberties are dire,” he said in the letter to Holder. “The right to own property is a fundamental right implicitly recognized in the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. I also believe that it is a human right.”

 

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.
Posted by editor on Monday, October 27 @ 08:28:57 MST (27 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



Is it in islam's interest to be understood?
Re Branding Sharia / Islam Evil Is it in islam's interest to be understood?

Is it in islam's interest to be understood?

Scott Talkington

Shares His Opinion

It's probably not in Islam's interest to be well understood, which is the main reason the Koran is set up to be indecipherable since it's not in historical or even rational order. But that doesn't mean it's not in our interest to understand Islam. After Christianity established the "last sacred victim" those who favored the old sacrificial way of looking at the world had to reinvent themselves as an ideology, and Islam was the first successful reinvention. It's basically a sacrificial religion that was successful because it's constructed on the basis of a dualistic ideology. It's strategic civilizational warfare.

There's not going to be a "return to normal" because what we called normal set us up to be exploited by dualistic ideologies. We have not yet seen the full subversive potential of Christianity because it very quickly got diverted onto the ideological track. The New Testament refers to this period as "the katechon."

What comes next will be viewed as either revelation or catastrophe depending on your perspective, but I prefer to see it as the removal of the veil that was torn 2000 years ago.

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use. buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.
Posted by editor on Monday, October 27 @ 07:18:54 MST (21 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



Sunni Moslem Obama's Counter-Terrorism Rules of Engagement
The Junk Yard Dog

Sunni Moslem Obama's Counter-Terrorism Rules of Engagement

Gives the Terrorist One Leg Up and going to get you Killed

When Will Congress Impeach Obama

SAYS:

‘Lone Wolf,’ or ‘Known Wolf’? The Ongoing Counter-Terrorism Failure

An extensive report shows how U.S. law enforcement missteps and dangerous policies keep getting people killed

+

 

Katie Gorka of the Council on Global Security has released an important report, “The Flawed Science Behind America’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy,” and events of this week show that it couldn’t be more timely. The separate terror attacks in Canada and a long string of terror attacks here in the U.S. show that the counter-terrorism policies of Western governments are fundamentally broken, and are directly responsible for getting their citizens killed. Even as I write this there are breaking reports of yet another attack.

The primary targets of Gorka’s new report are the various fictitious narratives and bogus social science models that drive Western counter-terrorism efforts. Chief among these is the “countering violent extremism (CVE)” narrative that has been the centerpiece for U.S. intelligence and law enforcement.

CVE has been a colossal disaster because it has no roots in reality. It was always intended as a convenient fiction for politicians, bureaucrats, media and academics to avoid talking about the problem of the ideology that supports Islamic terrorism.

There has never once been a recorded case of anyone on the planet swearing their allegiance to the ideology of “violent extremism” and their willingness to kill others and die in the cause of “violent extremism.” It is a null set. There is nothing to counter, which is the whole point. And yet there are academics and institutions who are the beneficiaries of mountains of taxpayer cash to pursue the elusive CVE unicorn.

CVE has been used to smuggle all kinds of crackpot theories into not just our counter-terrorism policy, but also our foreign policy.

One crackpot theory has been that there are good Islamists that we can use against the bad Islamists. This was the keystone of the Obama administration’s Arab Spring policies. And this theory put into practice in Egypt, Libya, Syria and other places has left the Middle East in even worse shape than Obama found it.

As Gorka observes, the administration’s head cheerleader for this “good Islamist/bad Islamist” approach has been Quintan Wiktorowicz, who served as senior director of the National Security Council under Obama. But the disaster of the Arab Spring has prompted Wiktorowicz and his CVE pals to double-down on this approach. Now we have entirely new categories of actors, such as “vetted moderates,” and even “good bad Islamists,” who presumably are any jihadists not currently wearing a suicide belt.

This rampant idiocy has become so bad that we have the supposed best and brightest in the Washington, D.C. foreign policy elite now calling for engagement with “moderate al-Qaeda” (no, I’m not kidding).

Another theory championed by the CVE crowd is the “lone wolf” syndrome, reportedly where unknown individuals unconnected to any other actor strike without warning. But numerous examples show that terrorist actors are almost always part of a network who were involved in recruiting and tasking terrorist activity. As Max Abrahms at Northeastern University has observed:

Since the advent of international terrorism in 1970, none of the 40 most lethal terrorist attacks has been committed by a person unaffiliated with some terrorist group, according to publicly available data from the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, which is funded by the Department of Homeland Security and stored at the University of Maryland. In fact, lone wolves have carried out just two of the 1,900 most deadly terrorist incidents over the last four decades.

So why “lone wolf”? Simply, it was a mechanism promulgated by the CVE industry, with willing cooperation from law enforcement and intelligence officials, to exonerate themselves when a terrorist attack happened. At its core is terror agnosticism: “There is possibly no way to predict who will turn to terrorism, so therefore we can’t be held responsible when it happens. Oh, and give us more money so we can better improve how we won’t be able to predict terror attacks.”

The two terror attacks in Canada this week, which are already being described by CVE industry practitioners as “lone wolf” attacks, were by individuals already known to Canadian counter-terrorism officials. Reportedly both Martin “Ahmad” Rouleau and Michael Zehaf-Bibeau had their passports taken away by Canadian authorities because they were considered “high risk” to travel overseas to join the Islamic State. We also have reports that Zehaf-Bibeau had contacts with known jihadist sympathizers and at least one individual who had fought in Syria.

Looking at the long string of domestic terror incidents here in the U.S. shows that the so-called “lone wolves,” in virtually every case, were in fact “known wolves.”

In fairness, this “known wolf” phenomenon goes back more than 20 years.

The cell responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing was well known to law enforcement. An FBI informant, Emad Salem, was operating inside their cell and had been repeatedly warning the FBI about the group’s intentions. As far back as 1989, the FBI had been watching these cell members conduct weapons training.

When one of the cell members, El Sayyid Nosair, killed Rabbi Meir Kahane in a New York City hotel in November 1990, law enforcement recovered hordes of information about the cell’s activities and intentions — but, as has been pointed out, it was never translated. My friend and colleague Andy McCarthy, who prosecuted some of the cell members after the 1993 WTC bombing, wrote a whole book about the affair, Willful Blindness: A Memoir of the Jihad.

I’ve seen this “known wolf” problem work first-hand.

******************************************

Posted by editor on Sunday, October 26 @ 12:33:08 MST (26 reads)
(Read More... | 78027 bytes more | Score: 0)



Another Obama Failed Logic Example Drug Dealer v Unlicensed pharmist
Reasons for Impeachment?

Another Obama Failed Logic Example

Drug Dealers v. Illegal Immigrants

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use. buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.
Posted by editor on Sunday, October 26 @ 08:40:36 MST (29 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



Undocumented Democrats Will elect Hillary!!!
The Junk Yard Dog Undocumented Democrat

And Now We Have Undocumented Democrats

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.
Posted by editor on Friday, October 24 @ 07:13:06 MST (25 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



Will Sessoms' boy wants to Screw You
The Junk Yard Dog

Virginia Beach Voters

Sessom's Friendly

Martin Thinks the Voters are That Stupid 

And Will Elect Yet Another Person that 

Wants to Screw Them

Will You Prove Him Right?

The War of 1812 was a Draw and over

Yet the Tax to Pay for it still lingers

As The Corrupt Politicians That support it Do

But that is your Fault You Continue to Elect Them

 

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use. buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.
Posted by editor on Friday, October 24 @ 05:12:44 MST (31 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



Questioning Obama's Wisdom and Morals
Reasons for Impeachment?

LET"S SEE IF I HAVE THIS RIGHT...

OBAMA WHOSE LAW LICENSE IS SUSPENDED

APPOINTED A HEAD OF THE CDC

WHOSE MEDICAL LICENSE IS SUSPENDED

Thomas Lipscomb

Questions the wisdom

And to make up for those failures... Obama has appointed a "crisis manager" as "EBOLA CZAR" who is neither a doctor or a scientists whose greatest exercise in crisis management was his failure to handle the Florida recount election in a way that gave victory to Al Gore.

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.
Posted by editor on Thursday, October 23 @ 07:27:01 MST (24 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



The Death of Lite Rail
One Picture Worth a Thousand Words Picture History of Lite Rail in Virginia Beach

Picture History of Lite Rail in Virginia Beach



buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.
Posted by editor on Wednesday, October 22 @ 15:00:17 MST (33 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



Will Michelle Host Ebola Benefit?
The Junk Yard Dog

 

Thomas Lipscomb Suggests:

HOW BOUT A BIG EBOLA BENEFIT IN DC, NY & LA?

Let's fly Ebola victims in to those three sites and prove there is no danger at all from a major epidemic. We can seat them at tables with the biggest donors, and give out gold plated Respirators to one class of donor, full HAZMAT suits to the largest donors.... and Kleenex boxes to every table....

We can get Soros, Michelle Obama, and Steve Spielberg to host.

 

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.
Posted by editor on Friday, October 17 @ 10:59:37 MST (36 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



Dyke Away
The Junk Yard Dog

 

Dyke Away Avowed lesbian mayor demands Christian pastors get her OK on sermons

This is in the U.S.  

 


LGBT advocates may find themselves at odds with a lesbian mayor who disregards the US Constitution for her own prejudices, say Christian pastors.
LGBT advocates may find themselves at odds with a lesbian mayor who disregards the US Constitution for her own prejudices, say Christian pastors.
Getty Images

A self-described lesbian serving as the mayor of a major U.S. city has decided she doesn't like what Christian church ministers are saying about homosexuality, same-sex marriage and other sexual orientation issues, according to a religious organization and talk show host on Thursday. She is threatening to punish pastors who do not submit their sermons to her office for approval and possible editing.

During the nationally syndicated radio show "Washington Watch" host Tony Perkins discussed the actions taken by Houston, Texas, Mayor Annise Parker who arbitrarily announced an unprecedented new law that is causing a firestorm within the Christian community, but is being ignored by the news media or, if covered, it's defended by denizens of the nation's newsrooms.

Her "legal" pronouncement commands that certain Christian church pastors must submit their sermons, emails, and text messages, even communications with members of their congregations, under the threat of fines, imprisonment or both. "This mayor is outrageous. I personally support gay marriage and other such issues, but this mayor has crossed the line and is threatening to punish people who exercise their First Amendment right. She's wrong on so many levels," said former city police chief Arthur Pullman. "This is political correctness running amok," he added.

According to several sources including Perkins, who appears regularly on Fox News Channel, CNN and other news stations and shows, the pastors who are being targeted by the mayor are those church leaders who have spoken out against Mayor Parker's LGBT (lesbians, gays, bi-sexuals and transsexuals) special rights ordinance. "Mayors do not and cannot pass laws; they pass ordinances. And this ordinance smacks of fascism. How dare this elected-official threaten the church leaders," said Iris Aquino, a former sex-crimes detective, who also supports most LGBT issues.

Christians across the nation are mobilizing to defend the group of targeted Houston pastors and their protest slogan is: Don’t Mess with Texas Preachers."Dave Welch, the executive director of the Texas Pastor Council, is one of the five ministers who received a subpoena. He said he will not be intimidated by Annise Parker, who is the city's first openly lesbian mayor, nor will he comply with the city’s demands," said Fox News Channel's Todd Starnes.

Mayor Parker has breached the wall of separation between the state and the church. This attack on religious freedom and the freedom of speech should be universally repudiated by all Americans who value our constitutional freedoms. A number of organizations are expected to react as information about Mayor Parker's political agenda is promulgated with or without the help of the news media.

"Thomas Jefferson once wrote that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions." The pulpit is to be governed only by the Word of God, and the chilling effect of government scrutiny of our pastors is unconstitutional, and unconscionable. Mayor Parker's use of her bully pulpit to silence pulpit freedom must be stopped in its tracks," said the pastors' attorney, Erik Stanley .

Stanley argues that:

"City officials are upset over a voter lawsuit filed after the city council rejected valid petitions to repeal a law that allows members of the opposite sex into each other’s restrooms. ADF attorneys say the city is illegitimately demanding that the pastors, who are not party to the lawsuit, turn over their constitutionally protected sermons and other communications simply so the city can see if the pastors have ever opposed or criticized the city."

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.
Posted by editor on Thursday, October 16 @ 12:19:29 MST (42 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



Sunni moslem Obama finds his game plan backfired
Re Branding Sharia / Islam Evil

Sunni moslem Obama finds his game plan backfired

U.S. Army officer fired for class on radical Islam invited to teach in U.K

Will Congress Impeach Hussein of America

 As Reported in:


Except for Fox News Channel, the majority of news organizations ignored Col. Dooley's plight.
Except for Fox News Channel, the majority of news organizations ignored Col. Dooley's plight.
Courtesy of M. Dooley/TMLC

A high-ranking United States Army military officer, who was fired from the National Defense University for teaching a politically-incorrect course onIslamic terrorism and strategic response, will be a featured speaker in Great Britain at a conference for French, Italian and British military and security personnel. The event is being sponsored by the SMi Group and will be held inLondon, England, on Nov. 17-18, 2014, according to counterterrorism expert and special operations officer Darryl Hines on Tuesday.

The United States Army's Lieutenant Colonel Matthew Dooley, considered a foremost expert on Islamic terrorism and asymmetrical warfare, was part of aU.S. purge of the military and law enforcement of men and women who refused to kowtow to President Barack Obama's politically-correct orthodoxy. Dooley, however, is being welcomed with opened arms by the British, who watched their own citizens beheaded by Islamist terrorists, and are taking the radical Muslim threat seriously.

Lt. Col. Dooley, a West Point graduate, is considered a top United States counterterrorism expert, who taught a course that familiarized military officers with the war against radical Islamists. In 2012, he was fired from the prestigious National Defense University (NDU) after he was informed the course materials he used would be revamped to exclude a number of items such as references to Islam and to replace the words Islam and terrorists with terms such as extremists and militants.

But that wasn't enough for complainers such as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), and so the course's author and instructor, Lt. Col. Dooley, was removed from the faculty permanently for basically telling students -- many of whom were battle-hardened military officers -- that many practitioners of Islam are responsible for terrorism.

“One can only wonder how much protection students at [NDU] who were Catholics and Christians would receive from this Administration and its media sycophants when they themselves verbally attack Christians,” said former police commander and military officer Mike Snopes.

According to Dooley, the National Defense University’s Joint Forces Staff College course included a slide-show that informed students that "their beloved country" is fighting a life and death battle with Islamists and that “we need to recognize that the U.S. and its allies are at war with Islam.” JFSC educates military officers and other national security leaders in joint, multinational, and interagency operational-level planning and warfare, counterterrorism and other subjects.

According to an Examiner source, it’s believed a complaining soldier, whose identity is being protected, may be the pawn of some of the Muslim groups such as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) or Muslim Advocates, who have successfully shutdown many law enforcement counterterrorism training courses.

“This politically correct nonsense would be laughed at if we had a reality check now and then. On the one hand, the majority of terrorist attacks worldwide are perpetrated by radical Muslims who actually apply the teachings of the Koran. Anyone who studies the history of Islam, especially within the
last two hundred years will discover what America faces is not new,” said Capt. Kevin Hanrahan, an expert in anti-terrorism and Islamic extremism.

“The CAIR group is considered by some to be a front-group for radical Islamists — several of whom are currently in prison or deported — and frequently supports certain Democratic politicians who do their bidding. Rep. John Conyers of Michigan is a perfect example,” Hanrahan alleges.

"Counterterrorism experts condemned by CAIR include Walid Phares, Robert Spencer, Bill Getz, Pam Geller and others who refuse to sugarcoat the Islamic terrorism threat,” Snopes added.

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use. buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.
Posted by editor on Wednesday, October 15 @ 19:56:33 MST (75 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



Death of a Traitor Causes A Revisit to the Rosenbergs
US Marxist Propaganda Media Organs Spin

The Death of a Traitor, David Greenglass

Causes The Rosenbergs To Be Revisited

What is the Truth

What is Revisionist History, What is Not

Rosenberg also stole major industrial secrets

radar for use in warfare

the first American designed jet engine

the P-80 Shooting Star, the first American jet manufactured in quantity and used in the Korean War

new anti-tank technology

As reported in: 

How David Greenglass 

Helped Break Up a Soviet Spy Ring 

That Was Plotting New Perfidy

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use. buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.
Posted by editor on Wednesday, October 15 @ 19:41:58 MST (64 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



Times' "Boy" Obama Wrong, Bush was Right
Middle East Times's Boy Obama Wrong

George W. Bush was Right

Times' "Boy" Obama Wrong

More Proof That Affirmative Action

Has Failed the Republic

Why is the Times silent on its failure to point out at the outset of the "boy's" run for President the "Boy" Lied

Pentagon kept Iraqi weapons of mass destruction secret, claims N.Y. Times

American soldiers fighting in Iraq after toppling the regime of dictator Saddam Hussein encountered chemical weapons multiple times in the years following the 2003 invasion, and officials at the Pentagon kept their discoveries secret from military investigators, fellow soldiers, and military physicians, according to a report on late Tuesday by the New York Times.

When ISIS captured a Saddam Hussein WMD facility most U.S. leaders avoided the subject.
When ISIS captured a Saddam Hussein WMD facility most U.S. leaders avoided the subject.
Courtesy of Armed Services Press Service

"'Nothing of significance’ is what I was ordered to say,” said former Major Jarrod Lampier, a recently retired Army officer who was present for the largest chemical weapons discovery of the war: more than 2,400 nerve-agent rockets unearthed in 2006 at a former Republican Guard compound.

The Times claims that U.S. soldiers encountered as many as 5,000 chemical warheads and chemical bombs during the Iraq invasion's aftermath. The newspaper known as "The Gray Lady" reported that soldiers were allegedly wounded by those weapons, which were believed to have been manufactured before the 1991 war with Iraq to repel that country's invasion of Kuwait. At least 17 Americans reportedly were exposed to the chemical agents during the war. At least another seven Iraqis were also exposed to theweapons of mass destruction (WMD).

The U.S. Department of Defense's secrecy allegedly prevented troops in some of the military's most dangerous assignments from being treated to chemical-agent exposure, and their wounds didn't receive the proper treatment by military medical personnel. According to Fox News Channel, since the beginning of the war against the government of the cruel Iraqi leader, the incidents of the encounters with chemical weapons in Iraq by those battling a deadly insurgency wasn't publicly shared nor shared with the military.

What troubles many experts on Islamic terrorism is that the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) controls much of the territory where the WMD was discovered. In fact, an Examiner news story reported that the Obama administration played down the ISIS takeover of WMD by saying ISIS won't be able to use anything they found in the Muthanna complex. The claimed that any suspected WMD (weapons of mass destruction) is contaminated and useless as weapons.

A former Army sergeant is quoted by the Times and Fox News as saying he feels as if he were used "like a guinea pig than a soldier." He said he sustained burns from mustard gas in 2007 yet he was refused hospital treatment nor would they give him "medical treatment or evacuation" even though his commander requested his removal from the battlefield.

Congress, too, was only partly informed, while troops and officers were instructed to be silent or give deceptive accounts of what they had found. Many chemical weapons incidents occurred around the ruins of the Muthanna State Establishment, the center of Iraqi chemical agent production in the 1980s.

In a communique sent to the United Nations just this summer, the Iraqi government claimed that about 2,500 corroded chemical rockets remained on the grounds, and that Iraqi officials had witnessed intruders looting equipment before militants shut down the surveillance cameras.

As reported in an Examiner news story in 2010, Julian Assange's Wikileaks web site released classified U.S. documents that revealed: U.S. military intelligence discovered chemical weapons labs, encountered insurgents who were specialists in the creation of toxins, and uncovered weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. However, Washington, DC officials and the news media have ignored this information. One of the WikiLeaks document dumps reveals that as late as 2008, American troops continued to find WMD in the region.

There are numerous mentions of chemical and biological weapons in the WikiLeaks documents, however the U.S. media appear only interested in those portions of the leaked material that highlight actions that are viewed as embarrassing for the U.S. military such as the accusation that U.S. commanders were aware of abuse and "torture" of prisoners by Iraqi soldiers and police officers.

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.
Posted by editor on Wednesday, October 15 @ 14:46:14 MST (76 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



Bank of America Hacked
Announcements ~ Recommendations Bank of America Hacked

Bank of America Hacked

Just got a Robo Call From

Bank of America Saying It Appears that

Their Credit Cards May Have Been Compromised

And that they are Sending Out a New Card

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use. buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.
Posted by editor on Wednesday, October 15 @ 09:26:46 MST (53 reads)
(Read More... | Score: 0)



Old Articles

Tuesday, October 14
· Sunni Moslems take over Tulsa Police Dept.
· Obama's Hostile Takeover of For Profit Colleges
Sunday, October 12
· an individual may “assert injury from governmental action
Friday, October 10
· WHY IS OBAMA SITTING ON HIS ASS AND NOT BLOCKING RUSSIA FROM THE U.S. NET
Thursday, October 09
· If is is from Harvard it can not be trusted !!
· Reading and Studying to much to ask blacks or so they say
· Once upon a time Presidents Opposed Communism
· CBS Lies By Omission
· Obama's latest war remains strangely anonymous.
Wednesday, October 08
· Barack Obama's 'war' on ISIS is a Lie
· Another Lie and Who's?
· Ebola, Obama's gift to the U.S. Sunni Moslem threat to U.S.
Tuesday, October 07
· What is the status of Virginia sex laws Marshall asks Herring
· Obama Killing Americans
Monday, October 06
· Mike Godwin , Facebook marxist troll
· Miss Mercy / Facebook / Yahoo / Internet Troll
Saturday, October 04
· Lite-Rail for Virginia Beach Science Fiction
· Obama's Power ~ The Con Job
Friday, October 03
· Moss For City Council ~ Fund Raiser
· Virginia Beach ~ where innocent citizens are punished for the acts of criminals
· Supreme Court role in the Lord of the Rings?
· the U.S. in the image of America's Moslem-in-chief
Thursday, October 02
· Top Cops and Prosecutors overlook deceit / due process
· The Obama Sunni Link - Terrorism The Family Business
Tuesday, September 30
· Evil Speech ~ Your Evil Speech is my Social Awareness
Sunday, September 28
· John Moss For Virginia Beach City Council
· Ken Cuccinell's words of Holder fall short'
Friday, September 26
· Holder and the Obama Pardon
Thursday, September 25
· What is Holder's Agenda
Wednesday, September 24
· Haslitt on Politicians and Money

Older Articles

LA Times on Politics

·Convicted? Indicted? Caught on video? Many voters don't seem to care
·Sen. Mary Landrieu says race hurts Obama in Louisiana
·Charlie Crist holds narrow lead in Florida, poll shows
·Obama heads to Maine to campaign for Democrat running for governor
·Around U.S., races for governor going down to the wire
·Hillary Clinton to Iowa voters: 'Dig deep' for Democrat Bruce Braley
·Few Latinos 'angry' over Obama immigration policy, but support slips
·Amid new high-tech campaign apps, Democrats in Georgia go old school
·Big out-of-state money pours into Missouri judicial race
·Leader or bully? Ebola response gives Chris Christie new attention

read more...

Forward

·Brooklyn Senior Citizen Caught With 221 Kiddie Porn Videos
·'Chickenshit'? Maybe But That's How Israelis Like Benjamin Netanyahu
·Jewish School Enrollment Rises by 12% — Orthodox Soars
·Amar'e Stoudemire Launches Campaign for Israeli Hatzalah
·Vietnam's First Israeli Film Festival Marks 20 Years of Diplomatic Relations
·'Quenelle' Comic Dieudonne Loses $50K Damage Suit for Banned Shows
·Temple Mount Activist Yehuda Glick Recovering After Shooting
·British Jewish School Flunks Tolerance Tests
·4 Ohio 'Blood Bucket' Protest Students Face Trial
·J Street Joins Push Against Israel Separate Bus Policy

read more...

Our Links To Reference Materials

HelpCom.Net's Amazon Store

Our Referenced Materials Can Be Found On Amazon.Com

Mouse Over and Click On the Amazon Logo

To Get your Copy of the Material

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.

Endorsement Authorizations, etc..

Published under HCN's:

[1] First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Rights:

The Constitution of the United States of America

1st Amendment

Freedom of Religion, of Speech, and of the Press. -- Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances .U.S. Constitution U.S. Con. 1st Amd. (1791);

The Constitution of the United States of America

5th Amendment

Rights of Accused in Criminal Proceedings. -- No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty [Noun (plural liberties) the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s way of life, behavior, or political views: . . .; a right or privilege, especially a statutory one: the Bill of Rights was intended to secure basic civil liberties . . . via Oxford dictionary:

http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/liberty Added by HCN] , or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. U.S. Constitution U.S. Con. 5th Amd. (1791)

The Constitution of the United States of America

14th Amendment

Section 1. Citizenship Rights Not to Be Abridged by States. -- All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. U.S. Constitution U.S. Con. 14th Amd., § 1 (1868);

[2] Sections One [1], Two [2], Three [3], Seven [7], Eleven [11], Twelve [12] Fourteen [14], Fifteen [15] and Seventeen [17] Rights in the Virginia Constitution

[Under accepted principles of statutory construction, . . . , statutes dealing with the same subject matter should, to the extent possible, be read together, the object being to give effect to the legislative intent. [ Vollin v. Arlington Co. Electoral Bd., 216 Va. 674, 222 S.E.2d 793 [The Unalienable Rights Foundation (HCN) has found that there are over 570 cases that state the same principles of statutory construction] (1976)Opinion of the Attorney General 1991 Va. AG 24, 25 (1991)];

Art. 1 § 1 (1971) Bill of Rights ~ Va. Constitution; That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety . . . , [Emphasis added];

Art. 1 § 2 (1971) Bill of Rights ~ Va. Constitution; That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people, that magistrates (a civil officer who administers the law ~added by UARF) are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them, [Emphasis added];

Art. 1 § 3 (1971) Bill of Rights ~ Va. Constitution; That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community; of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety, and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal [a sound, healthy, or prosperous state: well-being; : body politic, commonweal; Middle English wele, from Old English wela; akin to Old English wel well. First Known Use: before 12th century via http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/weal ~ added by UARF] [Emphasis added];

Art. 1 § 7 (1971) Bill of Rights ~ Va. Constitution; That all power of suspending laws, or the execution of laws, by any authority, without consent of the representatives of the people, is injurious to their rights, and ought not to be exercised.[Emphasis added];

Art. 1 § 11 (1971) Bill of Rights ~ Va. Constitution]; That no person shall be deprived of his life, liberty [Noun (plural liberties) the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s way of life, behavior, or political views: . . .; a right or privilege, especially a statutory one: the Bill of Rights was intended to secure basic civil liberties . . . via Oxford dictionary:

http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/liberty Added by UARF], or property without due process of law . . . .[Emphasis added];

Art. 1 § 12 (1971)Bill of Rights ~ Va. Constitution; That the freedoms of speech and of the press are among the great bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained except by despotic governments; that any citizen may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; that the General Assembly shall not pass any law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, nor the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for the redress of grievances. [Emphasis added];

Art. 1 § 14 (1971) Bill of Rights ~ Va. Constitution; That the people have a right to uniform government . . .[Emphasis added];

Art 1 § 15 (1971) Bill of Rights ~ Va. Constitution; That no free government, nor the blessings of liberty [Noun (plural liberties) the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s way of life, behavior, or political views: . . .; a right or privilege, especially a statutory one: the Bill of Rights was intended to secure basic civil liberties . . . via Oxford dictionary:

http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/ liberty Added by UARF], can be preserved to any people, but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue; by frequent recurrence to fundamental principles; and by the recognition by all citizens that they have duties as well as rights, and that such rights cannot be enjoyed save in a society where law is respected and due process is observed. . . .[Emphasis added];

Art. 1 § 17 (1971) Bill of Rights ~ Va. Constitution; The rights enumerated in this Bill of Rights shall not be construed to limit other rights of the people not therein expressed [Emphasis added].

[3] Authorized by HCN, a person - "Person" includes any individual, corporation, partnership, association, cooperative, limited liability company, trust, joint venture, government, political subdivision, or any other legal or commercial entity and any successor, representative, agent, agency, or instrumentality thereof. (Code 1919, § 5; Code 1950, § 1-13; 1950, p. 22, § 1-13.19; 1988, c. 36; 2005, c. 839.)Virginia Code 1-230.

Not authorized [except HCN] nor paid for any other person, anyone, nor entity, by what ever name that entity or person might be called, by the candidate or any campaign election committee.

 

buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.

Become a HCN Commentator

HCN Commentators come from all walks of life brining original content that entertains, informs, and inspires HNC’s readers. They are credible, passionate and influential because of their knowledge of a specific topics. Join their ranks. 

HCN posts are part of an open academic discussion among professionals and they are not intended to constitute either a professional opinion or professional advice. It is for academic discussion purposes only. It in no way expresses the true opinion of the commentator. HCN provides an academic forum for the free and open expression and discussion of ideas, theories, and concepts about  issues relating to government/political policy. Creativity, speculation and rumination are encouraged. The comments published here should not be taken to represent the commenter's position or opinion in any present or future publication or litigation; they should be regarded as tentative thoughts, subject later rethinking and revision in accordance with future promulgations.  They are not to be taken as professional advice and do not create any professional relationship.  Additionally, notwithstanding anything contained in this e-mail or the provisions of any “electronic signature” law, no offer is intended to be extended or accepted hereby and it is the intention of the commenter, author, and/or sender that a contract may only be formed by a document physically signed by the author or an appropriate officer of the employer of the author or its relevant subsidiary as the case may be.

 

To Request to Become a HNC Commentator

 



buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.

Big Story of Today
There isn't a Biggest Story for Today, yet.

Hurricane
·Atlantic Tropical Weather Outlook
·There are no tropical cyclones at this time.

read more...

Gas Prices 1/2hr Updates

HELPcom.NET Gas News


Unalienable Rights Foundation
·James Madison: A Life Reconsidered
·President is [b]ound to resist force by force.
·Is Nancy Bloom qualified to practice law?
·Josh Thompson / UARF Civil Rights Case Manager
·COSTCO responds to UARF's letter
·The Unalienable Rights Foundation Admonishes COSETO
·2014 Annual Supreme Court Round UP
·Who in Northampton County Govt. Forged Public Records?
·Will Virginia's Unalienable Rights Foundation sue Northampton County
·The Clean Air Act Framework that Preserves ''States' Rights''

read more...


 

HELPcom.NET

Voter News and Issues

P.O. Box 65002
Virginia Beach, VA 23467-5002

E - Mail US






Google Search helpcom.net

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © MMIX - MMXIV by Helpcom.net LLC [HCN].

Filed Under: Internet Law , Privacy , Advertising and Anti-Spam Regulations


You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php or ultramode.txt
Copyright; 2006 by HELPcom., LLC
 
buy medicines online pharmacy brand viagra online medicine online shopping generic dostinex Last news canadian pharmacy cialis optimise medicine use.